Pits Are For Chicks
Its a matter of opinion if the dog is a mutt. For all you know the dog is pure bred. Having no papers means just that YOU HAVE NO PAPERS. A dog having no papers doesn't make it a mutt, so his claims of the dog being a mutt are no more valid then her claim of the dog being pure bred. The dog has no known heritage on one side so it is nothing more than a dog who you will NEVER know if it is purebred or a mutt.wait, I thought any dog with unknown heritage that can be traced by records (registered or handwritten peds) from both parents or comes from one unpapered dogs and is the pup is also not papered, is a considered mutt for generalization purposes. Or if one parent is unknown, as this one appears, its considered a mutt? What do you mean proof a dog is a mutt. Proving I have a mutt is like telling me to prove I have an AmStaff. What am I missing lol
The person I jumped had no idea what he is talking about and just wanted to come in and jump on the bandwagon.
To the OP you have enough threads about this same subject all others will be deleted from this point on. We don't need 3 threads on whether this dog is dalmation or pitbull because without record of anything YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT HOW THE DOG IS BRED OTHER THAN ONE SIDE.