Very pretty dogs...
No joke. Their stud is 92 lbs. They seem to have gone full-on American Bully. On their pics page, they seem quite pleased over a 4-month-old, 63 pound puppy. (Double the weight at 4 months to get adult weight, would be...) I really wouldn't call them show dogs either, since they don't appear to have any show CHs on their page at present, and even the Castillo peds I've seen don't have many show achievements.i stoped looking as soon as i read "breeding for large boned"
Holy Cow! wish I could open the link...(internet nazi's at work)No joke. Their stud is 92 lbs. They seem to have gone full-on American Bully.
Agreed.I like some of the older Castillo dogs. But what they're producing now is just not impressive to me.
You're not missing too much, Syd. Some of their dogs look semi-close to how they used to look (only amplified). Others are just... well, sloppy, for lack of a better term. Let it marinade for a while and check it out later. LOLHoly Cow! wish I could open the link...(internet nazi's at work)
I have to disagree here. It's really an insult to carefully-planned UKC and AKC breeding plans to say that. People breeding show dogs will prove their dogs in the show ring; that's the ideal of their program, to have a winning dog. They will not deliberately breed in exaggerations or any kind of sloppiness that will detract from their dog in the ring. It looks to me that this line has gone more to breeding for size and a look that appeals to newbies (no offense to anyone who likes them).Def a UKC style show dog ... I wouldnt say they are american bullish more amstaffish
Again Not trying to insult but to me they look the same ... Some of the current dogs may be a little larger but I looked at the old dogs and the new dogs on that website and I personally don't see too much of a difference JMO. I wasn't saying they were all large but many of them were compared to typical game dogs structually their is a big difference even in SOME of the older dogs shown on that website they looked like amstaffs IMHO ...I have to disagree here. It's really an insult to carefully-planned UKC and AKC breeding plans to say that. People breeding show dogs will prove their dogs in the show ring; that's the ideal of their program, to have a winning dog. They will not deliberately breed in exaggerations or any kind of sloppiness that will detract from their dog in the ring. It looks to me that this line has gone more to breeding for size and a look that appeals to newbies (no offense to anyone who likes them).
ETA: Patch, I agree with you. If you go back in the pedigrees, there are some very nice dogs back there.
That's a very good question. I'd say that people are more interested in the name rather than the dog.of people are interested in dogs these sizes why not move on to another breed?
It depends on which you look at...LOL. That is why I used GARNER'S FOXI ROXI as an example. Just showing they all were not big.I dont see much of a difference from the old and the new
Actually, I have not seen any full Castillo bred dogs showing in my area and thus I don't think that is what they are breeding for...In the past though they were shown.Def a UKC style show dog