Go Pitbull Forums banner

1 - 5 of 5 Posts

Bitch Noone Wanted
8,939 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
>From RPOA Texas Outreach and
Responsible Pet Owners Alliance
"Animal welfare, not animal 'rights'
and, yes, there is a difference."
Permission granted to crosspost.
October 12, 2010

This alert from AKC below clearly demonstrates what we can do if we never
give up, never give in and never compromise with anti-pet legislation
designed to end our historic relationship with animals. The vote is today,
not tomorrow now! It was HSUS that first used "pit bulls" for fundraising
and spread much false information. We still have the 20-year-old HSUS
packet. If you haven't joined RPOA, please do so today. We need you! Our
website links are below. You can join with PayPal or the mail in
application. We keep the truth on the table in Texas. Do you know who your
legislators are?

From: doglaw <[email protected]>
Subject: AKC Legislative Alert: Toledo, OH to Consider Repeal of
Breed-Specific Law TOMORROW (10/12)!
To: "doglaw" <[email protected]>
Date: Monday, October 11, 2010, 3:37 PM

Please share this information with club members and other dog lovers in the
Toledo area:

AKC has just learned that thanks to all your hard work and education over
the past months, the Toledo City Council will meet on Tuesday, October 12th
to consider amending the portion of their Municipal Code that bans "pit
bulls" in the city. The new ordinance would address the deeds of dogs and
their owners, instead of punishing specific breeds. Responsible dog owners
and breeders are encouraged to attend and to call or send emails to the
council members thanking them for considering this measure and asking them
to support it.

The meeting information is as follows:

Toledo City Council Meeting
Tuesday, October 12th, 2010
4:00 P.M.
One Government Center , Suite 2120
Toledo , Ohio 43604

A full copy of the proposed changes can be found here.

Toledo ordinance 389-10 will repeal Municipal Code §505.14, which prohibited
the ownership of "pit bulls or pit bull mixed breed dogs". Due to repeated
questions about the adequacy and efficacy of this ban by Toledo citizens and
concerned dog owners, the Lucas County Dog Warden Citizens Advisory
Committee had recommended the removal of §505.14.

The AKC believes that dog owners should be responsible for their dogs. We
support laws that: establish a fair process by which specific dogs are
identified as "dangerous" based on stated, measurable actions; impose
appropriate penalties on irresponsible owners; and establish a well-defined
method for dealing with dogs proven to be dangerous. The AKC strongly
opposes any legislation
that determines a dog to be "dangerous" based on specific breeds or
phenotypic classes of dogs.

You'll have to GO TO American Kennel Club - akc.org for these links.
Click here for a printable handout with talking points on breed-specific
Click here to read the AKC's Issue Analysis "Why Breed-Specific Legislation
Doesn't Work"

If you are unable to attend the meeting, please take a moment to call or
e-mail the council members and ask them to support this proposal.

Phone number for all council members: 419-245-1050
City Council fax number: 419-245-1072
The e-mail addresses for the council are as follows:

Wilma Brown, Council President
[email protected]

Phillip Copeland, Councilman
[email protected]

Joe McNamara, Councilman
[email protected]

George Sarantou, Councilman
[email protected]

Adam, J. Martinez, Councilman
[email protected]

Rob Ludeman, Councilman
[email protected]

D. Michael Collins, Councilman
[email protected]

Mike Craig, Councilman
[email protected]

Michael D. Ashford, Councilman
[email protected]

Tom Waniewski, Councilman
[email protected]

Linday M. Webb
[email protected]

Steven Steel
[email protected]

Government Relations Department
American Kennel Club

Bitch Noone Wanted
8,939 Posts
Discussion Starter · #2 ·
They passed the new law and repealed the BSL!!!

toledoblade.com -- The Blade ~ Toledo Ohio

Dog law heading to council
Proposal aims to promote ownership responsibility

After months of research, crafting, and debate, a proposed Toledo law governing dogs and their owners will come before City Council Tuesday.

Councilmen will vote on repealing the city's old "vicious dogs" law that targeted "pit bulls" and "pit bull" mixes - ruled unconstitutional by Toledo Municipal Court Judge Michael Goulding in January - and replacing it with a law intended to promote responsibility among dog owners and change the scope of dogs considered to be dangerous.

The new law was written based on recommendations compiled by the Lucas County Dog Warden Advisory Committee at the request of Toledo Mayor Mike Bell in February.

The advisory committee's recommendations were presented to City Council in August, and those same recommendations largely will be what council considers tomorrow with a few exceptions.

Councilman Rob Ludeman will introduce an amendment raising the limit of time a dog can be tethered outside from 15 minutes to one hour. Mr. Ludeman said a dog can be tethered even longer if the pet's owner can see it and it's not a danger or nuisance to neighbors, but it may not be tied up outside at all if its owner is not home.

"This will make the law more friendly for responsible dog owners and further gives us the ability to address irresponsible dog owners," said Mr. Ludeman, who is also a part of the dog warden advisory committee.

Julie Lyle, the Lucas County dog warden who in the past has expressed concerns about the pending dog legislation, said Mr. Ludeman's amendment will make the law "less enforceable but easier for owners to meet its requirements."

"I likely wasn't going to send my deputies out to watch for dogs tethered up for 15 minutes, and I'm certainly not going to do that for an hour," Ms. Lyle said.

Ms. Lyle said the county dog warden's contract with the city has not been changed for her to enforce the new law and would have to be altered if council does indeed pass the proposed ordinance tomorrow.

The city's old legislation placed added restrictions on "pit bulls," including limiting ownership to one "pit bull" and requiring that "pit bulls" be leashed and muzzled when off owners' property. The new proposal would apply a set of restrictions to misbehaving dogs of any breed, not just "pit bulls."

Highlights of the new ordinance coming before council include:

•An escalating scale of fines for unprovoked dog bites. Penalties would rise from $150 to $500 to $1,000 and could include mandatory pet ownership classes or community service with an animal welfare organization.

•New "level one" and "level two" threat classifications for nuisance and dangerous dogs.

•Restrictions against leaving a dog unattended for more than 24 hours.

•Mandatory spay or neuter surgery at the owner's expense for dogs caught running at large more than once.

•The ability to seize the dogs of owners deemed reckless.

"There are a lot of great ideas in there, but there are a lot of limitations too," Ms. Lyle said.

City Council is also considering the repeal of penalties for killing or injuring animals based on their monetary value and replacing them with a uniform, first-degree misdemeanor charge for the killing or injuring of any domestic or farm animal.

Contact Joe Vardon at:
[email protected]
or 419-724-6559.

toledoblade.com -- The Blade ~ Toledo Ohio

Premium Member
1,034 Posts
Very nice! Amazing what can happen when common sense comes back into play!

9,589 Posts
Excellent news!! It's about time! Now, let's hope that the rest of the places that have BSL in effect will follow suite!
1 - 5 of 5 Posts