Go Pitbull Forums banner
1 - 4 of 4 Posts

Bitch Noone Wanted
8,939 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
The town council of Friday Harbor, Washington will be discussing revisions to its animal control ordinance in a work session Thursday, February 17, 2011 at 5:30 PM in Council Chambers located at 60 Second Street in Friday Harbor.

According to Town Attorney Adina Cunningham's February 11, 2010 memo to town officials, the discussion will likely include breed specific language that could target several breeds of dogs (as per the request of the council).
http://www.fridayharbor.org/PDF/Council Packet/021711/dog.pdf

The public is welcome to attend and speak at the meeting during the designated public access time. Speakers are asked to provide their name and address for the record. Comments should be limited to three minutes per individual and five minutes if representing a group.

It should be noted that Friday Harbor DOES NOT have an animal control officer.

If you are in or near the Friday Harbor, Washington area, please make every effort to attend the town meeting tomorrow afternoon. Please politely and respectfully remind the town council of the many problems associated with breed specific ordinances, in addition to the town's lack of anyone to enforce such a discriminatory ordinance.

Tighter rules on dangerous dogs takes center stage at Thursday's town council meeting

Journal of the San Juans Reporter
Today, 11:12 AM

Just how far they're willing to go remains to be seen.

But the Friday Harbor Town Council made no bones about its intent to tighten up on town law and to clamp down on dangerous dogs, and on potentially dangerous ones as well.

At the council's request, town staff is expected to present a set of preliminary regulations for consideration when the council meets this Thursday, Jan. 20.

Councilman Noel Monin said town law should contain "some teeth" and that the town will also need a means by which to enforce whatever rules and regulations the council eventually agrees upon.

"I think what's called for are clear, well-defined punishments for people who our negligent with their animals," said Monin, who suggested a committee also be formed to gather public input before the council enacts any new regulations.

The call for tighter rules comes on the heels of several recent dog attacks within the town's boundaries.

On Dec. 17, a 3-year-old boy was bitten by a pitbull, which reportedly was on a leash at the time, in the parking lot of the library. The dog was later released to its owner following 10 days in quarantine at the animal shelter.

The day before, a different dog, which reportedly has a history of inflicting harm on other animals and intimidating pedestrians, ran into a yard on Maple Street and attacked the dog that lives at the home.

The owner of the dog that was attacked, Virginia Beaudoin, joined a half-dozen islanders in calling on the council to enact stricter rules on dogs capable of unprovoked assaults, and stiffer penalties upon their owners as well.

"I've made eight calls minimum to 911 because that dog is in my neighborhood every day," Beaudoin said. "Every time I was told they couldn't do anything because it's in the town of Friday Harbor."

Unlike the county, the town has no rules regulating dangerous or potentially dangerous dogs, or that set up a process by which a dog is determined be either.

Currently, town ordinance states that any dog "displaying the tendencies and symptoms" of a vicious dog can be considered a public nuisance. It is unlawful to "keep or maintain" a public-nuisance dog within the town limits.

At the council's Jan. 6 meeting, Undersheriff Jon Zerby said county law contains a process by which a dog can be declared dangerous or potentially dangerous.

He said that although the sheriff has authority to make that determination, that decision can be appealed in district court.

Zerby said the owner of a dangerous or potentially dangerous dog must obey certain standards that apply to their pet, such as making sure it stays in its yard or on a leash, and may face criminal penalties if restrictions are ignored.

In general, Zerby said the type of restrictions depend on the dog, its history, and whether it's a repeat offender. There are 19 potentially dangerous dogs in the county, he said, and of those, 10 are pitbulls.

Town attorney Adina Cunnigham said the council can adopt stricter standards than those of the county, as well as a lower "threshold" for determining whether a dog is "dangerous", rather than potentially dangerous.

Councilwoman Maria De Freitas recommended the county's law as a good starting point, but that its "threshold" may be too forgiving.

"We need to sure whatever we're doing matches the adequate criteria with protecting our citizens," she said. "This threshold may be too low."

Journal of the San Juans Reporter Scott Rasmussen can be reached at [email protected] or 360-378-5696.

Tighter rules on dangerous dogs takes center stage at Thursday's town council meeting - Journal of the San Juans

Forum Manager
4,908 Posts
too close to home. AGAIN.
please continue lettters everyone, this breed is being suppressed and the media isnt letting up.

Bitch Noone Wanted
8,939 Posts
Discussion Starter · #3 ·
*** I got this from my Yahoo BSL group ***

Well, good news is that BSL was voted down. And, I now have 3 wonderful contacts in the council/committee members. I also learned that the Mayor was pro-BSL but the votes were 3-2 so it was voted against....too close for my liking but still good news!
1 - 4 of 4 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.