Oh, and for the record. IMO, there's nothing wrong with a scatterbred dog, as long as there's a particular direction you're headed with that scattered breeding. I know everyone has to start somewhere.
However, when you clearly advertise on your site that you're breeding for color preference, and there's no titles or health testing to be shown for it.. what purpose are you really serving in breeding these dogs?
Yeah, so you've got some good WP dogs out there that you produced, but if you have to put a notice on your site saying you can't guarantee the chocolate color and that if people email or snailmail you pix of a pup you produced to please list their names and the dog's FULL name, b/c you don't/won't/can't recognize it w/out the FULL name, that sounds to me like you've got too much going on!
Let's get something straight. I breed specific "RED NOSE" lines. Lines which are Lar-San/Wilrox with some Castillo. Rednose comes in buckskin, chocolate, brindle, red, red fawn. What the heck are you talking about when you say I breed for color? As for the statement, people come to me looking for "chocolate".... lolol.. hence the color statement I have up. 2 litters a year constitute a puppy mill when I have 10 dogs..please go on! You all are a joke. So much for being bored on a Saturday nite, but, hey, I had some fun, sooo... As far as it hurting me as a breeder? Not a chance. But hell, we all like a good heated thread every once in a while involving a successful breeder don't we? lololol.. I'm out. Have a good one.
GO STEELERS!! GO PITTSBURGH!!